首页> 外文OA文献 >Maximizing the impact of systematic reviews in health care decision making: A systematic scoping review of knowledge-translation resources
【2h】

Maximizing the impact of systematic reviews in health care decision making: A systematic scoping review of knowledge-translation resources

机译:最大限度地发挥系统评价对医疗保健决策的影响:对知识翻译资源进行系统的范围审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Context: Barriers to the use of systematic reviews by policymakers may be overcome by resources that adapt and present the findings in formats more directly tailored to their needs. We performed a systematic scoping review to identify such knowledge-translation resources and evaluations of them. Methods: Resources were eligible for inclusion in this study if they were based exclusively or primarily on systematic reviews and were aimed at health care policymakers at the national or local level. Resources were identified by screening the websites of health technology assessment agencies and systematic review producers, supplemented by an email survey. Electronic databases and proceedings of the Cochrane Colloquium and HTA International were searched as well for published and unpublished evaluations of knowledge-translation resources. Resources were classified as summaries, overviews, or policy briefs using a previously published classification. Findings: Twenty knowledge-translation resources were identified, of which eleven were classified as summaries, six as overviews, and three as policy briefs. Resources added value to systematic reviews by, for example, evaluating their methodological quality or assessing the reliability of their conclusions or their generalizability to particular settings. The literature search found four published evaluation studies of knowledge-translation resources, and the screening of abstracts and contact with authors found three more unpublished studies. The majority of studies reported on the perceived usefulness of the service, although there were some examples of review-based resources being used to assist actual decision making. Conclusions: Systematic review producers provide a variety of resources to help policymakers, of which focused summaries are the most common. More evaluations of these resources are required to ensure users' needs are being met, to demonstrate their impact, and to justify their funding. © 2011 Milbank Memorial Fund. Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.
机译:背景:可以通过以更直接适合其需求的格式来适应和呈现调查结果的资源,来克服政策制定者使用系统审查的障碍。我们进行了系统的范围界定审查,以识别此类知识翻译资源并对其进行评估。方法:如果资源完全或主要基于系统评价,并且针对国家或地方卫生保健决策者,则有资格纳入本研究。通过筛选卫生技术评估机构和系统评价产生者的网站来确定资源,并辅以电子邮件调查。还检索了Cochrane学术讨论会和HTA International的电子数据库和会议记录,以查找已发表和未发表的知识翻译资源评估。使用先前发布的分类将资源分类为摘要,概述或政策摘要。结果:确定了20种知识翻译资源,其中11种归类为摘要,六种为概述,三种为政策简介。资源可以通过例如评估其方法学质量或评估其结论的可靠性或对特定环境的普遍性来增加系统评价的价值。文献检索发现了四篇已发表的有关知识翻译资源的评估研究,摘要的筛选和与作者的联系发现了另外三篇未发表的研究。大多数研究报告了该服务的有用性,尽管有一些基于审查的资源被用于辅助实际决策的例子。结论:系统的评审制片人提供各种资源来帮助决策者,其中重点突出的摘要是最常见的。需要对这些资源进行更多评估,以确保满足用户的需求,展示其影响并证明其资金合理。分级为4 +©2011 Milbank Memorial Fund。由Wiley Periodicals Inc.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号